Brooke v. River Park Hospitality Inc.
Opinion
1.40 UV VULYVO WAND PVVULPIOEIt Ot □□□ Vaicorecy Paye +vrst
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9} THERESA BROOKE, Case No. 1:20-cv-00102-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) RIVER PARK HOSPITALITY INC., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Defendant. (ECF No. 30) On September 25, 2020, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule □□ (a). IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. 54 Dated: _ September 25, 2020 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brooke v. River Park Hospitality Inc. (Brooke v. River Park Hospitality Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.