Brooke v. Georgia Peruvian Ochre Co.
This text of 79 S.E. 362 (Brooke v. Georgia Peruvian Ochre Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The permission granted by the defendant to the plaintiff to use a portion of the defendant’s land for agricultural purposes was subsequent to the delivery of the unconditional warranty deed by the plaintiff, conveying the same premises to the defendant; and, so far as appears from the record, this permission was given without consideration. A verdict in favor of the defendant was therefore demanded, and errors in the charge, if any, were immaterial. No material error was committed in the admission of testimony. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 S.E. 362, 13 Ga. App. 463, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooke-v-georgia-peruvian-ochre-co-gactapp-1913.