Brooke v. Commissioner

D.C. Circuit

Brooke v. Commissioner

13 F. App'x 7

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJune 29, 2001

DocketNo. 00-1482

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 F. App'x 7 (Brooke v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brooke v. Commissioner, 13 F. App'x 7 (D.C. Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the briefs and appendix filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See Fed. R.App. 36; D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the United States Tax Court is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion of June 28, 2000. Appellant’s challenge to appellee’s calculation of appellant’s alternative minimum tax liability has no effect on our conclusion that the decision of the Tax Court should be affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the briefs and appendix filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See Fed. R.App. 36; D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the United States Tax Court is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion of June 28, 2000. Appellant’s challenge to appellee’s calculation of appellant’s alternative minimum tax liability has no effect on our conclusion that the decision of the Tax Court should be affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 F. App'x 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooke-v-commissioner-cadc-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack