Brook v. . Wood

Court of King's Bench

Brook v. . Wood

1 N.C. 784

DecidedJuly 5, 1793

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 784 (Brook v. . Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brook v. . Wood, 1 N.C. 784 (kingsbench 1793).

Pincite

Opinion

Case. The plaintiff declared that the defendant, being indebted to him in an account £ 60, in consideration that the plaintiff would forbear suing him, assumed to pay, etc., and declared to his damage, etc. On nihildicit the judgment was quod recuperet damna sua praedict, and there being no writ of inquiry awarded, the judgment was reversed. It was a judgment in an inferior court. Postea, p. 785; Noy, 96.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Case. The plaintiff declared that the defendant, being indebted to him in an account £ 60, in consideration that the plaintiff would forbear suing him, assumed to pay, etc., and declared to his damage, etc. On nihildicit the judgment was quod recuperet damna sua praedict, and there being no writ of inquiry awarded, the judgment was reversed. It was a judgment in an inferior court. Postea, p. 785; Noy, 96.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brook-v-wood-kingsbench-1793.