Brook v. . Wood

Court of King's Bench

Brook v. . Wood

1 N.C. 784

Court of King's Bench·Decided July 5, 1793·Published

Opinion

Case. The plaintiff declared that the defendant, being indebted to him in an account £ 60, in consideration that the plaintiff would forbear suing him, assumed to pay, etc., and declared to his damage, etc. On nihildicit the judgment was quod recuperet damna sua praedict, and there being no writ of inquiry awarded, the judgment was reversed. It was a judgment in an inferior court. Postea, p. 785; Noy, 96.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Case. The plaintiff declared that the defendant, being indebted to him in an account £ 60, in consideration that the plaintiff would forbear suing him, assumed to pay, etc., and declared to his damage, etc. On nihildicit the judgment was quod recuperet damna sua praedict, and there being no writ of inquiry awarded, the judgment was reversed. It was a judgment in an inferior court. Postea, p. 785; Noy, 96.

Brook v. . Wood, 1 N.C. 784 (kingsbench 1793).

Pincite

1 N.C. 784 (Brook v. . Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.