Brook v. Protean Investors, Inc.
373 So. 2d 440, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 21021
Opinion
Affirmed. Clifford Ragsdale, Inc. v. Morganti, Inc., 356 So.2d 1321 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Neida’s Boutique, Inc. v. Gabor and Company, 348 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Weiner v. Lozman and Weinberg, P. A., 340 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Miami Auto Auction, Inc. v. Friendly Enterprises, Inc., 257 So.2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); Reynolds v. Deep South Sports, Inc., 211 So.2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brook v. Protean Investors, Inc., 373 So. 2d 440, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 21021 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).
373 So. 2d 440 (Brook v. Protean Investors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Edward L. Nezelek, Inc. v. Sunbeam Tel. Corp.
413 So. 2d 51 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Cruse v. Cruse
373 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)