Bronx Gas & Electric Co. v. Maltbie
This text of 244 A.D. 859 (Bronx Gas & Electric Co. v. Maltbie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Orders and determination annulled, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, and matter renlitted on the authority of Matter of Kings County Lighting Co. v. Maltbie [ante, p. 475], decided herewith: Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee and Bliss, JJ., concur. Heffernan, J. I dissent and vote to confirm the determina^ tion df the Commission in this proceeding for the reasons stated in my dissenting views in Matter of Kings County Lighting Co. v. Maltbie [ante, p. 475], decided herewith. The only difference in the facts in this ease from the companion case is that here there is no outstanding order made by the Commission determining the Compensation and expenses to be paid by the petitioner and consequently there is no reason to direct the remission. [See post, p. 871; revd., 268 N. Y. 278.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 A.D. 859, 280 N.Y.S. 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bronx-gas-electric-co-v-maltbie-nyappdiv-1935.