Bronson v. State

751 So. 2d 194, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1686, 2000 WL 201244
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 23, 2000·No. No. 4D98-0326·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

TAYLOR, J.

AFFIRMED. See Harvey v. State, No. 4D97-2820, — So.2d —, 2000 WL 140456 (Fla. 4th DCA Feb. 9, 2000); Watson v. State, No. 97-2868, — So.2d —, 2000 WL 36237 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan.19, 2000); Salters v. State, 731 So.2d 826 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), rev. granted, 749 So.2d 503 (Fla. 1999).

On the issue of the applicable window period for challenging chapter 95-182 on single subject rule grounds, we certify conflict with the second district’s decision in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d at 317 n. 1, as we did in Harvey, Watson, and Salters.

WARNER, C.J. and OWEN, WILLIAM C., JR., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bronson v. State, 751 So. 2d 194, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1686, 2000 WL 201244 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

751 So. 2d 194 (Bronson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bronson v. State
768 So. 2d 439 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)