Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Bronson v. State

Bronson v. State

10 So. 2d 718, 152 Fla. 28, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 681
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 1, 1942·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Claude Bronson, with others, was convicted in a trial on. an information charging the breaking and entering of a building with intent to commit grand larceny. From a study of the record we are of the' opinion that the state did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that at the time the appellant broke and entered he entertained an intent to commit grand larceny, but there is ample testimony to establish the breaking and entering with intent to commit petit larceny; therefore, under the provisions of Section 310, Criminal Procedure Act (Section 924.34, Florida Statute, 1941), the judgment of the trial court is reversed “with directions . . . to enter judgment” for the latter offense.

Reversed.

BROWN, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bronson v. State, 10 So. 2d 718, 152 Fla. 28, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 681 (Fla. 1942).

10 So. 2d 718 (Bronson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foster v. State
220 So. 2d 406 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Thompson v. State
207 So. 2d 692 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Channell v. State
107 So. 2d 284 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Jalbert v. State
95 So. 2d 589 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
McKee v. State
33 So. 2d 50 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1947)