Bronson v. State
This text of 10 So. 2d 718 (Bronson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Claude Bronson, with others, was convicted in a trial on. an information charging the breaking and entering of a building with intent to commit grand larceny. From a study of the record we are of the' opinion that the state did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that at the time the appellant broke and entered he entertained an intent to commit grand larceny, but there is ample testimony to establish the breaking and entering with intent to commit petit larceny; therefore, under the provisions of Section 310, Criminal Procedure Act (Section 924.34, Florida Statute, 1941), the judgment of the trial court is reversed “with directions . . . to enter judgment” for the latter offense.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 So. 2d 718, 152 Fla. 28, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bronson-v-state-fla-1942.