Bronson v. Bronson

254 A.D.2d 737, 678 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10421
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 2, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In this custody proceeding, Family Court properly weighed and considered the appropriate factors affecting the best interests of the children, including the quality of the respective home environments of the parties (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171-174). The court was “in the best position to evaluate the character and credibility of the witnesses” (Matter of Paul C. v Tracy C., 209 AD2d 955, 956). Its determination has a sound and substantial basis in the record and should not be disturbed (see, Matter of Gloria S. v Richard B., 80 AD2d 72, 76). (Appeal [738]*738from Order of Oneida County Family Court, Flemma, J.H.O.— Custody.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bronson v. Bronson, 254 A.D.2d 737, 678 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10421 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

254 A.D.2d 737 (Bronson v. Bronson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Winkelman v. Furey
273 A.D.2d 890 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)