Bronson v. Bronson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bronson v. Bronson

254 A.D.2d 737, 678 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10421

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 2, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 254 A.D.2d 737 (Bronson v. Bronson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bronson v. Bronson, 254 A.D.2d 737, 678 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10421 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In this custody proceeding, Family Court properly weighed and considered the appropriate factors affecting the best interests of the children, including the quality of the respective home environments of the parties (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171-174). The court was “in the best position to evaluate the character and credibility of the witnesses” (Matter of Paul C. v Tracy C., 209 AD2d 955, 956). Its determination has a sound and substantial basis in the record and should not be disturbed (see, Matter of Gloria S. v Richard B., 80 AD2d 72, 76). (Appeal [738]*738from Order of Oneida County Family Court, Flemma, J.H.O.— Custody.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In this custody proceeding, Family Court properly weighed and considered the appropriate factors affecting the best interests of the children, including the quality of the respective home environments of the parties (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171-174). The court was “in the best position to evaluate the character and credibility of the witnesses” (Matter of Paul C. v Tracy C., 209 AD2d 955, 956). Its determination has a sound and substantial basis in the record and should not be disturbed (see, Matter of Gloria S. v Richard B., 80 AD2d 72, 76). (Appeal [738]*738from Order of Oneida County Family Court, Flemma, J.H.O.— Custody.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D.2d 737, 678 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bronson-v-bronson-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack