Bronson Methodist Hospital v. Michigan Assigned Claims Facility

Michigan Supreme Court

Bronson Methodist Hospital v. Michigan Assigned Claims Facility

871 N.W.2d 205, 498 Mich. 928, 2015 Mich. LEXIS 2760

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided November 25, 2015·No. Nos. 151343 and 151344; Court of Appeals Nos. 317864 and 317866·Published

Opinion

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that the defendant Michigan Assigned Claims Plan could not deny the plaintiff hospital’s application for assignment of its claim for benefits as “an obviously ineligible claim,” MCL 500.3173a. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the Court of Appeals erred when it concluded that the defendant Michigan Assigned Claims Plan could not deny the plaintiff hospital’s application for assignment of its claim for benefits as “an obviously ineligible claim,” MCL 500.3173a. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

Bronson Methodist Hospital v. Michigan Assigned Claims Facility, 871 N.W.2d 205, 498 Mich. 928, 2015 Mich. LEXIS 2760 (Mich. 2015).

Pincite

871 N.W.2d 205 (Bronson Methodist Hospital v. Michigan Assigned Claims Facility) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.