Bronson Health Care Group Inc v. Titan Insurance Company
This text of Bronson Health Care Group Inc v. Titan Insurance Company (Bronson Health Care Group Inc v. Titan Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 22, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
Robert P. Young, Jr. Brian K. Zahra 153850 Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, BRONSON HEATH CARE GROUP, INC., Justices d/b/a BRONSON METHODIST HOSPITAL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 153850 COA: 324847 Kalamazoo CC: 2014-000011-NF TITAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff- Appellant and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.
_______________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 15, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 22, 2017 a0315 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bronson Health Care Group Inc v. Titan Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bronson-health-care-group-inc-v-titan-insurance-company-mich-2017.