Bronger v. Donald

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Bronger v. Donald

296 S.W.2d 221

DecidedNovember 30, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 296 S.W.2d 221 (Bronger v. Donald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bronger v. Donald, 296 S.W.2d 221 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Willie Donald and Inda Simpson were awarded damages in the sums of $459.96 and $1,315, respectively, against Ralph F. Bronger, arising from an auto collision. By the judgment, Inland Empire Insurance Company, subrogee of Donald, recovered $374.96 of the amount awarded to him. Bronger and his subrogee, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, have moved for an appeal.

The record has been examined and no prejudicial error has been found.

The motion for appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Willie Donald and Inda Simpson were awarded damages in the sums of $459.96 and $1,315, respectively, against Ralph F. Bronger, arising from an auto collision. By the judgment, Inland Empire Insurance Company, subrogee of Donald, recovered $374.96 of the amount awarded to him. Bronger and his subrogee, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, have moved for an appeal.

The record has been examined and no prejudicial error has been found.

The motion for appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

296 S.W.2d 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bronger-v-donald-kyctapp-1956.