Bronaugh v. Exchange Nat. Bank of Ardmore
This text of 1922 OK 205 (Bronaugh v. Exchange Nat. Bank of Ardmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is before us on motion to dismiss the appeal, one ground of such motion being that the appeal is frivolous and for delay merely.
It appears that the action was upon a promissory note executed by the defendant V. Bronaugh, indorsed by W. W. Jeter, and payable to the order of the defendant in error. Jeter entered his appearance in the trial court and waived the issuance and service of summons, but did not answer or otherwise plead. Bronaugh filed an unverified general denial. No evidence was offered on behalf of the defendants below. It is apparent from the record that the appeal is frivolous and is for delay merely.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1922 OK 205, 207 P. 728, 86 Okla. 220, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bronaugh-v-exchange-nat-bank-of-ardmore-okla-1922.