Bromley v. Joseph
3 Whart. 10, 1837 Pa. LEXIS 209
This text of 3 Whart. 10 (Bromley v. Joseph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bromley v. Joseph, 3 Whart. 10, 1837 Pa. LEXIS 209 (Pa. 1837).
Opinion
The Court quashed the writ, on the ground that the affidavit of the plaintiff was insufficient, and that the other deponent was not such an agent as the act of assembly contemplated.
Capias quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Whart. 10, 1837 Pa. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bromley-v-joseph-pa-1837.