Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Bromhal v. Stott

Bromhal v. Stott

465 S.E.2d 536, 342 N.C. 418
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bromhal v. Stott. Read the opinion of the Court — 341 N.C. 702 →
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 7, 1995·No. 520A94·Published

Opinion

465 S.E.2d 536 (1995)
342 N.C. 418

Laura Leigh Boone (Stott) BROMHAL
v.
E. Gregory STOTT.

No. 520A94.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 7, 1995.

Jack P. Gulley, Kenyann G. Brown, John M. Kirby, Raleigh, for E. Gregory Stott.

Michael F. Schilawski, Cary, for Laura (Stott) Bromhal.

Prior report: 341 N.C. 702, 462 S.E.2d 219.

*537 ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C.Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th day of December 1995."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bromhal v. Stott, 465 S.E.2d 536, 342 N.C. 418 (N.C. 1995).

465 S.E.2d 536 (Bromhal v. Stott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bromhal v. Stott
462 S.E.2d 219 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1995)
Bromhal v. Stott
342 N.C. 418 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1995)