Bromfield v. Lovejoy
1 Super. Ct. Jud. 237
Opinion
took a Distinction between Gentleman by Curtesy, and Reputation, and feemed to be of Opinion, that, if a Man was Gentleman by Curtesy, Yeoman was not his sue Addition; aliter if Gentleman by Reputation only. In the present Case they were of Opinion, that Lovejoy was a Gentleman, both by his Commission and by Curtefy. Therefore they ruled, that the Writ abate, though they said it was a very great Hardship upon the Bar.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bromfield v. Lovejoy, 1 Super. Ct. Jud. 237 (Mass. 1767).
1 Super. Ct. Jud. 237 (Bromfield v. Lovejoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.