Bromell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bromell v. State

777 So. 2d 438, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1097, 2001 WL 99212

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 7, 2001

DocketNo. 4D98-4282

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 777 So. 2d 438 (Bromell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bromell v. State, 777 So. 2d 438, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1097, 2001 WL 99212 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION FOR CERTIFICATION OF CONFLICT AND MOTION TO STAY MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

We withdraw our previously issued opinion and substitute the following in its place.

We affirm appellant’s conviction but remand for resentencing as appellant’s sentences were imposed pursuant to both the Violent Career Criminal statute and the Prison Releasee Reoffender statute. On remand, the trial court should sentence him only under the Prison Releasee Reof-fender statute. See Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000); Yehowshua v. State, 773 So.2d 654 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

WARNER, C.J., KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI