Brombacher v. Journeymen Barbers International Union of America

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Brombacher v. Journeymen Barbers International Union of America

143 A. 804, 6 N.J. Misc. 1069, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 18

DecidedNovember 30, 1928

StatusPublished

This text of 143 A. 804 (Brombacher v. Journeymen Barbers International Union of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brombacher v. Journeymen Barbers International Union of America, 143 A. 804, 6 N.J. Misc. 1069, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 18 (N.J. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A writ of attachment was issued out of the District Court of the Pirst Judicial District of the county of Hudson. The judge of that court refused to quash the writ upon application. The certiorari was allowed to review that determination. The reason urged for setting aside such determination by the District Court is because the Local Union No. 362, Journeymen Barbers International Union of America had no money or property belonging to the Journeymen Barbers International Union of America. This is not a sufficient reason for setting aside or quashing the attachment, if properly issued. If property not belonging to the defendant has been attached it may be returned upon a proper proceeding.

The judgment of the District Court of the Pirst Judicial District of the county of Hudson is affirmed, with costs..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

A writ of attachment was issued out of the District Court of the Pirst Judicial District of the county of Hudson. The judge of that court refused to quash the writ upon application. The certiorari was allowed to review that determination. The reason urged for setting aside such determination by the District Court is because the Local Union No. 362, Journeymen Barbers International Union of America had no money or property belonging to the Journeymen Barbers International Union of America. This is not a sufficient reason for setting aside or quashing the attachment, if properly issued. If property not belonging to the defendant has been attached it may be returned upon a proper proceeding.

The judgment of the District Court of the Pirst Judicial District of the county of Hudson is affirmed, with costs..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 A. 804, 6 N.J. Misc. 1069, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brombacher-v-journeymen-barbers-international-union-of-america-nj-1928.