Brogie v. State

760 P.2d 1316, 1988 WL 88117
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedSeptember 21, 1988
DocketPC-88-302
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 760 P.2d 1316 (Brogie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brogie v. State, 760 P.2d 1316, 1988 WL 88117 (Okla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART POST-CONVICTION RELIEF

The petitioner has appealed to this Court from an order of the District Court of Cleveland County, on March 23,1988, denying his application for post-conviction relief in Case No. CRF-79-640. Of the many assignments of error which petitioner has raised, we find only one which has merit.

On March 28, 1980, petitioner was convicted by a jury of First Degree Felony Murder in the District Court of Cleveland County. The petitioner was sentenced to death. The only aggravating circumstance found by the jury was that the murder was “especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.” The instruction given by the trial court in petitioner’s case, a correct instruction at that time, concerning that aggravating circumstance was the same instruction that the United States Supreme Court later held to be unconstitutionally vague in Maynard v. Cartwright, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1853, 100 L.Ed.2d 372 (1988). The instruction failed to channel or limit the sentence’s discretion during the imposition of the death penalty.

In Stouffer v. State, 742 P.2d 562 (Okl. Cr.1987), this Court limited the aggravating circumstance of “especially heinous, atrocious or cruel” to those cases which involve torture or serious physical abuse. Insomuch as the trial court’s instruction omitted the second paragraph of OJJI-CR 436 (1981), we must modify petitioner’s sentence to life imprisonment in accordance with Maynard v. Cartwright, supra.

IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT, that the order of the District Court is AFFIRMED and petitioner’s sentence is modified to life imprisonment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BRETT, P.J., and BUSSEY and PARKS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Warner v. State
2006 OK CR 40 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 2006)
Robinson v. State
900 P.2d 389 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1995)
Perry v. State
1995 OK CR 20 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1995)
Medlock v. State
1994 OK CR 65 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1994)
Bryson v. State
1994 OK CR 32 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1994)
Romano v. State
1993 OK CR 8 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1993)
Woodruff v. State
1993 OK CR 7 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1993)
Crawford v. State
1992 OK CR 62 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1992)
Thomas v. State
811 P.2d 1337 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
760 P.2d 1316, 1988 WL 88117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brogie-v-state-oklacrimapp-1988.