Brogdon v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles

D. Arizona

Brogdon v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles

DecidedFebruary 3, 2022

Docket4:20-cv-00566

StatusUnknown

This text of Brogdon v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles (Brogdon v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brogdon v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles, (D. Ariz. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 George Brogdon, et al. ) No. CV 20-566-TUC-JAS (MSA) ) 10 Plaintiffs, ) ORDER ) 11 vs. ) ) 12 ) Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los) 13 Angeles, et al. ) ) 14 Defendants. ) ) 15 16 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 17 Magistrate Judge Aguilera that recommends granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss. A 18 review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and 19 Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not 20 consider any objections or new evidence. 21 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Aguilera’s 22 recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; 23 Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 24 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 26 (1) Magistrate Judge Aguilera’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 72) is accepted and 27 adopted in its entirety. 28 1 || (2) The motions to dismiss (Docs. 45, 46, 47) are granted as discussed in the Report and 2 || Recommendation and the second amended complaint is dismissed without leave to amend. 3 || (3) This case is dismissed. 4 || (4) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. 6 7 Dated this 3rd day of February, 2022. 9 10 11 12 _\ e C. Aico 13 Honorable James A. Soto 14 United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 George Brogdon, et al. ) No. CV 20-566-TUC-JAS (MSA) ) 10 Plaintiffs, ) ORDER ) 11 vs. ) ) 12 ) Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los) 13 Angeles, et al. ) ) 14 Defendants. ) ) 15 16 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 17 Magistrate Judge Aguilera that recommends granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss. A 18 review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and 19 Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not 20 consider any objections or new evidence. 21 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Aguilera’s 22 recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; 23 Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 24 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 26 (1) Magistrate Judge Aguilera’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 72) is accepted and 27 adopted in its entirety. 28 1 || (2) The motions to dismiss (Docs. 45, 46, 47) are granted as discussed in the Report and 2 || Recommendation and the second amended complaint is dismissed without leave to amend. 3 || (3) This case is dismissed. 4 || (4) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. 6 7 Dated this 3rd day of February, 2022. 9 10 11 12 _\ e C. Aico 13 Honorable James A. Soto 14 United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _2-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Brogdon v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brogdon-v-roman-catholic-archbishop-of-los-angeles-azd-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack