Brogden v. State
This text of 44 Tex. 103 (Brogden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellee was indicted under the act of February 12, 1858, (Crim. Code, art. 775a,) making it a misdemeanor for any one to unlawfully remove, sell, or in any other manner dispose of any animal which has been taken up by him as an estray. The gist of the offense in such cases is the unlawful disposition made of the animal. The venue should therefore be laid in the county where this unlawful act is done, and not in that where the animal is estrayed.
[104]*104It is averred with sufficient certainty that the heifer was taken up by appellee as an estray. And to charge one with unlawfully killing an animal which he had taken up as an estray manifestly alleges an unlawful disposition of it and the manner in which it is done.
For the error of the court in quashing the indictment the judgment is reversed and the case remanded.
Reveesbd and eemanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 Tex. 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brogden-v-state-tex-1875.