BROGAN v. FIN AND FEATHERS

District Court, M.D. Georgia·Decided April 11, 2025·No. 7:24-cv-00127·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

MICHELLE BROGAN, : : Plaintiff, : v. : CASE NO.: 7:24-CV-00127 (WLS) : FIN & FEATHERS, et al., : : Defendants. : : ORDER Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8). Based on a preliminary review of the Motion, the Court finds there is a reasonable probability that the Motion will be granted or substantially narrow the issues. The Court therefore finds good cause for a stay of discovery. See Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp., 123 F.3d 1353, 1368 (11th Cir. 1997) (“[W]hen faced with a motion to dismiss a claim for relief that significantly enlarges the scope of discovery, the district court should rule on the motion before entering discovery orders, if possible.”). As a result, Discovery is sua sponte STAYED pending the resolution of the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8).

SO ORDERED, this 11th day of April 2025.

/s/ W. Louis Sands W. LOUIS SANDS, SR. JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROGAN v. FIN AND FEATHERS, (M.D. Ga. 2025).

BROGAN v. FIN AND FEATHERS (BROGAN v. FIN AND FEATHERS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp.
123 F.3d 1353 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)