Broga v. Seelye
229 A.D. 747
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1930·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the return was conclusive as to the facts embodied therein; but we do not pass upon the question whether the defendant may have relief by an action in equity. (Smith v. Lowry, 1 Johns. Ch. 320; Dobson v. Pearce, 12 N. Y. 156,165; Weimer v. Guinnane, 125 Misc. 681; United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U. S. 61.) All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Broga v. Seelye, 229 A.D. 747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
229 A.D. 747 (Broga v. Seelye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Van Orsdale v. Genesee Valley Garage, Inc.
150 Misc. 655 (New York County Courts, 1934)
East Syracuse Motor Car Co. v. Tuttle
230 A.D. 872 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)