Broga v. Seelye

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Broga v. Seelye

229 A.D. 747

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1930

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 229 A.D. 747 (Broga v. Seelye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Broga v. Seelye, 229 A.D. 747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the return was conclusive as to the facts embodied therein; but we do not pass upon the question whether the defendant may have relief by an action in equity. (Smith v. Lowry, 1 Johns. Ch. 320; Dobson v. Pearce, 12 N. Y. 156,165; Weimer v. Guinnane, 125 Misc. 681; United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U. S. 61.) All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the return was conclusive as to the facts embodied therein; but we do not pass upon the question whether the defendant may have relief by an action in equity. (Smith v. Lowry, 1 Johns. Ch. 320; Dobson v. Pearce, 12 N. Y. 156,165; Weimer v. Guinnane, 125 Misc. 681; United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U. S. 61.) All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 A.D. 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broga-v-seelye-nyappdiv-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack