Brody v. Martinelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brody v. Martinelli

2 A.D.2d 888, 156 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4044

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 5, 1956·Published

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, the appeal is from an order and judgment (one paper) granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment striking out appellants’ answer and counterclaim. Order and judgment reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. A triable issue of fact is presented as to whether there was any consideration for the mortgage. (Di Menna & Sons v. City of New York, 301 N. Y. 118; Braun v. Carey, 280 App. Div. 1019; Chapman v. Chapman, 284 App. Div. 504, 509.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, the appeal is from an order and judgment (one paper) granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment striking out appellants’ answer and counterclaim. Order and judgment reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. A triable issue of fact is presented as to whether there was any consideration for the mortgage. (Di Menna & Sons v. City of New York, 301 N. Y. 118; Braun v. Carey, 280 App. Div. 1019; Chapman v. Chapman, 284 App. Div. 504, 509.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Brody v. Martinelli, 2 A.D.2d 888, 156 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4044 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

2 A.D.2d 888 (Brody v. Martinelli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related