Brody v. Martinelli

2 A.D.2d 888, 156 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4044

This text of 2 A.D.2d 888 (Brody v. Martinelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brody v. Martinelli, 2 A.D.2d 888, 156 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4044 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, the appeal is from an order and judgment (one paper) granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment striking out appellants’ answer and counterclaim. Order and judgment reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. A triable issue of fact is presented as to whether there was any consideration for the mortgage. (Di Menna & Sons v. City of New York, 301 N. Y. 118; Braun v. Carey, 280 App. Div. 1019; Chapman v. Chapman, 284 App. Div. 504, 509.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Braun v. Carey
280 A.D. 1019 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
Chapman v. Chapman
284 A.D. 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
Nicholas Di Menna & Sons, Inc. v. City of New York
92 N.E.2d 918 (New York Court of Appeals, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 A.D.2d 888, 156 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brody-v-martinelli-nyappdiv-1956.