Brody v. Kalb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brody v. Kalb

246 A.D. 768

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Order denying motion, made by plaintiff under section 110-a of the Civil Practice Act, to remove the action from the City Court, Kings County", to the Supreme Court, to permit service of an amended complaint increasing the amount of damages, and to direct that the action be placed on the calendar of the Supreme Court, Trial Term, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion, made by plaintiff under section 110-a of the Civil Practice Act, to remove the action from the City Court, Kings County", to the Supreme Court, to permit service of an amended complaint increasing the amount of damages, and to direct that the action be placed on the calendar of the Supreme Court, Trial Term, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.

Brody v. Kalb, 246 A.D. 768 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

246 A.D. 768 (Brody v. Kalb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.