Brody v. Kalb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brody v. Kalb

246 A.D. 768

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 768 (Brody v. Kalb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brody v. Kalb, 246 A.D. 768 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion, made by plaintiff under section 110-a of the Civil Practice Act, to remove the action from the City Court, Kings County", to the Supreme Court, to permit service of an amended complaint increasing the amount of damages, and to direct that the action be placed on the calendar of the Supreme Court, Trial Term, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion, made by plaintiff under section 110-a of the Civil Practice Act, to remove the action from the City Court, Kings County", to the Supreme Court, to permit service of an amended complaint increasing the amount of damages, and to direct that the action be placed on the calendar of the Supreme Court, Trial Term, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brody-v-kalb-nyappdiv-1935.