Brody v. Brody

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brody v. Brody

24 A.D.2d 878, 264 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3012

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 878 (Brody v. Brody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brody v. Brody, 24 A.D.2d 878, 264 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3012 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

In a separation action, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 7, 1965, insofar as it directs him to pay as [879]*879alimony pendente lite, in addition to $700 per month, all the carrying charges upon the marital residence, including mortgage payments, taxes, insurance, repairs and maintenance, which latter includes fuel oil, gas and electricity, gardener’s and water bills. Order modified, without costs, by striking out the third ordering paragraph except insofar as it directs defendant to make the mortgage payments upon the present residence of the plaintiff and the children of the parties. As so modified, order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, Special Term’s direction that defendant pay the other carrying charges, in addition to $700 per month for the support and maintenance of plaintiff and the three children of the parties, was excessive to the extent indicated. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a separation action, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 7, 1965, insofar as it directs him to pay as [879]*879alimony pendente lite, in addition to $700 per month, all the carrying charges upon the marital residence, including mortgage payments, taxes, insurance, repairs and maintenance, which latter includes fuel oil, gas and electricity, gardener’s and water bills. Order modified, without costs, by striking out the third ordering paragraph except insofar as it directs defendant to make the mortgage payments upon the present residence of the plaintiff and the children of the parties. As so modified, order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, Special Term’s direction that defendant pay the other carrying charges, in addition to $700 per month for the support and maintenance of plaintiff and the three children of the parties, was excessive to the extent indicated. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 878, 264 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brody-v-brody-nyappdiv-1965.