Brody v. Brenner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brody v. Brenner

213 A.D.2d 258, 624 N.Y.S.2d 817

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 213 A.D.2d 258 (Brody v. Brenner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brody v. Brenner, 213 A.D.2d 258, 624 N.Y.S.2d 817 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.), entered June 21, 1994, which, after an allocation between the parties, directed defendant to pay the sum of $64,425.18 to counsel for plaintiff, with related relief, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There is no reason in this case to disturb the conclusions of the IAS Court in this matter concerning counsel’s time, effort and skills (see, Feldman v Feldman, 194 AD2d 207, 219). A noncustodial parent can be awarded fees for unsuccessful custody litigation in "a proper case” (Sheil v Sheil, 29 AD2d 950, 951), such as this.

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments, and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Kupferman and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.), entered June 21, 1994, which, after an allocation between the parties, directed defendant to pay the sum of $64,425.18 to counsel for plaintiff, with related relief, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There is no reason in this case to disturb the conclusions of the IAS Court in this matter concerning counsel’s time, effort and skills (see, Feldman v Feldman, 194 AD2d 207, 219). A noncustodial parent can be awarded fees for unsuccessful custody litigation in "a proper case” (Sheil v Sheil, 29 AD2d 950, 951), such as this.

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments, and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Kupferman and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 A.D.2d 258, 624 N.Y.S.2d 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brody-v-brenner-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack