Brodus and Aura Parham v. Sherry Johanne Edwards and Marvin E. Turner
This text of 470 F.2d 1000 (Brodus and Aura Parham v. Sherry Johanne Edwards and Marvin E. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
470 F.2d 1000
Brodus and Aura PARHAM, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Sherry Johanne EDWARDS and Marvin E. Turner, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 72-3001 Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Jan. 16, 1973.
J. S. Hutto, Brunswick, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Anthony D. Smith, Albert Fendig, Jr., Brunswick, Ga., for defendants-appellees.
Before GEWIN, AINSWORTH and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
For reasons sufficiently stated by the District Court, 346 F.Supp. 968 (S.D. Georgia 1972), the judgment is affirmed.
Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
470 F.2d 1000, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 12150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brodus-and-aura-parham-v-sherry-johanne-edwards-and-marvin-e-turner-ca5-1973.