Brodt v. Maryland

Fourth Circuit

Brodt v. Maryland

235 F. App'x 147

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 14, 2007·No. No. 07-1185·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Howard Brodt appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brodt v. Maryland, No. 1:06—cv-02331-AMD (D.Md. Jan. 29, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Howard Brodt appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brodt v. Maryland, No. 1:06—cv-02331-AMD (D.Md. Jan. 29, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brodt v. Maryland, 235 F. App'x 147 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

235 F. App'x 147 (Brodt v. Maryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.