Brodsky v. Motorists Casualty Insurance
176 A. 143, 114 N.J.L. 154, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 196
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brodsky v. Motorists Casualty Insurance, 176 A. 143, 114 N.J.L. 154, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 196 (N.J. 1935).
176 A. 143 (Brodsky v. Motorists Casualty Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Perkins v. Perkins
284 S.W.2d 603 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1955)
Blue Ridge Insurance Company v. Haun
276 S.W.2d 711 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1954)
McCarthy v. Insurance Company of Texas
271 S.W.2d 836 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1954)