Brodsky v. Buchanan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Brodsky v. Buchanan

217 So. 2d 338, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6341

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 7, 1969

DocketNo. 68-429

StatusPublished

This text of 217 So. 2d 338 (Brodsky v. Buchanan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brodsky v. Buchanan, 217 So. 2d 338, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6341 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

SWANN, Judge.

Appellant [plaintiff below] appeals from the summary final judgments for the defendants.

The summary final judgment for T. A. Buchanan, as Sheriff of Dade County, is affirmed. See McNayr v. Kelly, Fla.1966, 184 So.2d 428, and Saxon v. Knowles, Fla.App.1966, 185 So.2d 194.

The summary final judgment for the other appellees is affirmed but on a different ground. The record conclusively [339]*339shows that Napier, a police inspector of the City of Miami, forwarded the name of appellant Brodsky to the office of the Sheriff of Dade County, Florida three months prior to the alleged libelous publication. He is not shown to have had any control over the use, if any, the Sheriff’s office made of this information or any control, directly or indirectly, over whether or not the Sheriff’s office published anything concerning the same.

The summary final judgments are, therefore,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SWANN, Judge.

Appellant [plaintiff below] appeals from the summary final judgments for the defendants.

The summary final judgment for T. A. Buchanan, as Sheriff of Dade County, is affirmed. See McNayr v. Kelly, Fla.1966, 184 So.2d 428, and Saxon v. Knowles, Fla.App.1966, 185 So.2d 194.

The summary final judgment for the other appellees is affirmed but on a different ground. The record conclusively [339]*339shows that Napier, a police inspector of the City of Miami, forwarded the name of appellant Brodsky to the office of the Sheriff of Dade County, Florida three months prior to the alleged libelous publication. He is not shown to have had any control over the use, if any, the Sheriff’s office made of this information or any control, directly or indirectly, over whether or not the Sheriff’s office published anything concerning the same.

The summary final judgments are, therefore,

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 So. 2d 338, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brodsky-v-buchanan-fladistctapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack