Brodnex, Ike Antyon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 5, 2014·No. PD-1087-14·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-1087-14

IKE ANTYON BRODNEX, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE ELEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS MIDLAND COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

The Court refuses appellant’s petition for discretionary review. The Court grants

review on its own motion and requests briefing from the parties on the following question:

Does an officer have reasonable suspicion to detain a suspect based upon observing the suspect walking with another person at 2 a.m. in an area known for narcotics activity and based upon the officer’s unsubstantiated belief that the suspect is a “known criminal”? BRODNEX -2

The Clerk of this Court will send copies of this order to the Court of Appeals for the

Eleventh District, the State Prosecuting Attorney, the District Attorney for Midland County,

and Appellant.

Entered November 5, 2014 Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brodnex, Ike Antyon v. State, (Tex. 2014).

Brodnex, Ike Antyon v. State (Brodnex, Ike Antyon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.