BRODMERKEL v. JAMES McCULLAGH CO. INC.
888 N.E.2d 388, 10 N.Y.3d 821, 858 N.Y.S.2d 647, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 1007
This text of 888 N.E.2d 388 (BRODMERKEL v. JAMES McCULLAGH CO. INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
BRODMERKEL v. JAMES McCULLAGH CO. INC., 888 N.E.2d 388, 10 N.Y.3d 821, 858 N.Y.S.2d 647, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 1007 (N.Y. 2008).
Opinion
DOUGLAS BRODMERKEL, Appellant,
v.
JAMES McCULLAGH CO., INC., et al., Respondents.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
888 N.E.2d 388, 10 N.Y.3d 821, 858 N.Y.S.2d 647, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 1007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brodmerkel-v-james-mccullagh-co-inc-ny-2008.