Brodman v. Rade
127 A. 249, 101 N.J.L. 207, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 203
This text of 127 A. 249 (Brodman v. Rade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brodman v. Rade, 127 A. 249, 101 N.J.L. 207, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 203 (N.J. 1925).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Cutler in the Circuit Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None. *Page 212
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Moore v. Ennis
162 A. 751 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1932)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
127 A. 249, 101 N.J.L. 207, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brodman-v-rade-nj-1925.