Brodlie v. Fink
275 A.D.2d 1061
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 31, 1949
StatusPublished
This text of 275 A.D.2d 1061 (Brodlie v. Fink) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brodlie v. Fink, 275 A.D.2d 1061 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).
Opinion
The contract being within the Statute of Frauds, parol evidence is inadmissible to supply any of its essential terms. Johnston, Acting P. J,. Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 1061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brodlie-v-fink-nyappdiv-1949.