Brodie v. Seagroves

3 N.C. 70
CourtSuperior Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 15, 1798
StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.C. 70 (Brodie v. Seagroves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brodie v. Seagroves, 3 N.C. 70 (N.C. Ct. App. 1798).

Opinion

Per curiara.

Haywood, Justice.

Supposing the constable* to have sold in the manner here stated, of his own accord tho’* the sale was irregular, still the property vested in the vendee £ but if sold pursuant to an agreement between Brodie and Finch,, then the unusual manner of the sale, (that is to say, the setting up of all the goods at one bid, especially when that tends as in. the present case, to make the goods sell at a ‘great undervalue,, and consequently to disappoint some creditor, who otherwise.-xnight have obtained satisfaction of his debt also) is an evidence-nf fraud which is to be collected from circumstances, and will; vitiate the sale in toto.

Verdict and judgment for the defendant*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.C. 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brodie-v-seagroves-ncsuperct-1798.