Brodeur v. Hayes
842 N.E.2d 19, 5 N.Y.3d 871, 808 N.Y.S.2d 134, 2005 N.Y. LEXIS 3304
This text of 842 N.E.2d 19 (Brodeur v. Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brodeur v. Hayes, 842 N.E.2d 19, 5 N.Y.3d 871, 808 N.Y.S.2d 134, 2005 N.Y. LEXIS 3304 (N.Y. 2005).
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed Supreme Court’s denial [872]*872of appellant’s motion to dismiss the counterclaim, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Eichengrun v. Panasci
202 N.Y.S.3d 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Matter of Walker v. Lippman
145 A.D.3d 1330 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
KaufmanvMedicalLiabilityMutualInsuranceCompany
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Kaufman v. Medical Liability Mutual Insurance
121 A.D.3d 1459 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
M & R Ginsburg, LLC v. Segal, Goldman, Mazzotta & Siegel, P.C.
90 A.D.3d 1208 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Sevey v. Friedlander
83 A.D.3d 1226 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Continental AFA Dispensing Co. v. AFA Polytek, B v. (In Re Indesco International, Inc.)
451 B.R. 274 (S.D. New York, 2011)
Country Club Partners, LLC v. Goldman
79 A.D.3d 1389 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Yost v. Quartararo
64 A.D.3d 1073 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Bixby v. Somerville
62 A.D.3d 1137 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Adamski v. Lama
56 A.D.2d 1071 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Mega Group, Inc. v. Pechenik & Curro, P.C.
32 A.D.3d 584 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Antokol v. Myers
30 A.D.3d 843 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Peak v. Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P.C.
28 A.D.3d 1028 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
de la Concha v. Fordham University
28 A.D.3d 963 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Amodeo v. Gellert & Quartararo, P.C.
26 A.D.3d 705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
842 N.E.2d 19, 5 N.Y.3d 871, 808 N.Y.S.2d 134, 2005 N.Y. LEXIS 3304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brodeur-v-hayes-ny-2005.