Brodesser v. Power

199 N.E.2d 839, 14 N.Y.2d 769, 250 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1143
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 27, 1964
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 199 N.E.2d 839 (Brodesser v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brodesser v. Power, 199 N.E.2d 839, 14 N.Y.2d 769, 250 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1143 (N.Y. 1964).

Opinion

In the first and second above-entitled proceedings: Order reversed, without costs. The designation of Marano is valid since section 137 of the Election Law by its terms does not apply to the Conservative party which in 1964 is designating candidates for the first time within the meaning of subdivision 5 of that section.

In the third above-entitled proceeding: Order reversed, without costs. The designation of Smith is valid since section 137 [771]*771of the Election Law by its terms does not apply to the Conservative party which in 1964 is designating candidates for the first time within the meaning of subdivision 5 of that section.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Hamm

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MATTER OF BRODESSER v. Power
199 N.E.2d 839 (New York Court of Appeals, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 N.E.2d 839, 14 N.Y.2d 769, 250 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brodesser-v-power-ny-1964.