Broderick v. Suffolk County Bar Ass'n

157 A.D.2d 780, 550 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 728
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 22, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 157 A.D.2d 780 (Broderick v. Suffolk County Bar Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Broderick v. Suffolk County Bar Ass'n, 157 A.D.2d 780, 550 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate or modify an arbitration award dated November 17, 1987, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), entered March 22, 1988, which, in effect, dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the arbitrators improperly prevented him from submitting relevant evidence or from conducting cross-examination during the arbitration hearing. The record does not contain any factual evidence to support the petitioner’s assertions in this regard. While this lack of evidence is attributable to the fact that the minutes of the hearing were not recorded, the petitioner cannot rely upon this fact to support his claims, inasmuch as he participated in the arbitration with knowledge that no record was being kept and thereby waived any issue regarding the lack of such record (see, CPLR 7506 [f]; Matter of Reale [Healy N Y. Corp.], 54 AD2d 1039; see also, 8 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶ ¶ 7506.19, 7506.26).

Accordingly, he has failed to sustain his burden of demonstrating a ground for vacatur or modification of the award, and the proceeding was properly dismissed. Brown, J. P., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Government Empls. Ins. Co. v. Schussheim
122 A.D.3d 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
In re the Arbitration between New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Ass'n
304 A.D.2d 954 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Goldsborough v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
217 A.D.2d 546 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 A.D.2d 780, 550 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broderick-v-suffolk-county-bar-assn-nyappdiv-1990.