Broderick v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
This text of 554 F. App'x 27 (Broderick v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff-Appellant Jennifer W. Broder-ick (“Broderick”) alleged a Massachusetts state-law claim for unfair and deceptive trade practices in connection with the origination of a “no income verification” home mortgage loan. She now appeals from the district court’s dismissal of her amended complaint as time-barred under the relevant statute of limitations.
Having thoroughly reviewed the record and Broderick’s brief on appeal, we affirm the dismissal of her amended complaint substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. We add that, in view of the final judgment in Broderick’s previous civil action, Broderick v. PNC Mortgage Corp., No. 1:11-cv-10047-WGY (D.Mass.), her claim is likely barred under the doctrine of claim preclusion. See, e.g., Silva v. City of New Bedford, 660 F.3d 76, 78-81 (1st Cir.2011).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
554 F. App'x 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broderick-v-pnc-financial-services-group-inc-ca1-2014.