Broderick v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.

554 F. App'x 27
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided May 23, 2014·No. 13-1158·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-Appellant Jennifer W. Broder-ick (“Broderick”) alleged a Massachusetts state-law claim for unfair and deceptive trade practices in connection with the origination of a “no income verification” home mortgage loan. She now appeals from the district court’s dismissal of her amended complaint as time-barred under the relevant statute of limitations.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record and Broderick’s brief on appeal, we affirm the dismissal of her amended complaint substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. We add that, in view of the final judgment in Broderick’s previous civil action, Broderick v. PNC Mortgage Corp., No. 1:11-cv-10047-WGY (D.Mass.), her claim is likely barred under the doctrine of claim preclusion. See, e.g., Silva v. City of New Bedford, 660 F.3d 76, 78-81 (1st Cir.2011).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broderick v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., 554 F. App'x 27 (1st Cir. 2014).

554 F. App'x 27 (Broderick v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vaiano v. Equifax Inc.
D. Massachusetts, 2025
Rasla v. Wells
D. Massachusetts, 2024