Broderick v. Keisler
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Upon review of the record and appellant’s opening brief, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court’s order denying appellant’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief. See United States v. [794]*794Hooton, 698 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record); see also Gregorio T. v. Wilson, 59 F.3d 1002, 1004-05 (9th Cir.1995) (denial of preliminary injunctive relief reviewed for abuse of discretion).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
250 F. App'x 793 (Broderick v. Keisler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.