Broderick v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co.

Eighth Circuit

Broderick v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co.

79 F.2d 386, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4121

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 23, 1935

DocketNo. 10274

StatusPublished

This text of 79 F.2d 386 (Broderick v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Broderick v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co., 79 F.2d 386, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4121 (8th Cir. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

FARIS, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to stipulation filed in this court on March 19, 1935, it was agreed by counsel for appellants and appellee herein that the record in the companion case, entitled James McKee v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Company (C. C. A.) 79 F.(2d) 384, should be taken as the record in the case at bar. And it was “further stipulated and agreed that the judgment, decision and decree of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals in said case” (McKee v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Company) “shall govern in all things the case of John P. Broderick et al. v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Company.”

It follows, from the expression of our views and the conclusion reached in the McKee Case, that the appeal herein should be dismissed, with costs to be taxed against appellants, and so we order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FARIS, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to stipulation filed in this court on March 19, 1935, it was agreed by counsel for appellants and appellee herein that the record in the companion case, entitled James McKee v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Company (C. C. A.) 79 F.(2d) 384, should be taken as the record in the case at bar. And it was “further stipulated and agreed that the judgment, decision and decree of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals in said case” (McKee v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Company) “shall govern in all things the case of John P. Broderick et al. v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Company.”

It follows, from the expression of our views and the conclusion reached in the McKee Case, that the appeal herein should be dismissed, with costs to be taxed against appellants, and so we order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 F.2d 386, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broderick-v-great-lakes-pipe-line-co-ca8-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack