Broderick v. Broderick

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Broderick v. Broderick

561 So. 2d 478, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4029, 1990 WL 73353

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 6, 1990

DocketNo. 89-1577

StatusPublished

This text of 561 So. 2d 478 (Broderick v. Broderick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Broderick v. Broderick, 561 So. 2d 478, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4029, 1990 WL 73353 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the authority of Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980), we affirm the order of modification and payment of arrearages except as to the following. The appellant is entitled to recover the full amount vested for unreimbursed medical insurance premiums. Additionally, the portion of the order eliminating the appellee’s obligation to pay the insurance premiums is beyond the scope of the pleadings. Therefore, we reverse in part and remand with directions to increase the amount of arrear-ages to be paid by two thousand one hundred forty dollars ($2,140.00), and to reinstate the payments due for medical insurance premiums.

LETTS, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On the authority of Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980), we affirm the order of modification and payment of arrearages except as to the following. The appellant is entitled to recover the full amount vested for unreimbursed medical insurance premiums. Additionally, the portion of the order eliminating the appellee’s obligation to pay the insurance premiums is beyond the scope of the pleadings. Therefore, we reverse in part and remand with directions to increase the amount of arrear-ages to be paid by two thousand one hundred forty dollars ($2,140.00), and to reinstate the payments due for medical insurance premiums.

LETTS, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

561 So. 2d 478, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4029, 1990 WL 73353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broderick-v-broderick-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack