Broderick v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Broderick v. Board of Education

233 A.D. 701

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 233 A.D. 701 (Broderick v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Broderick v. Board of Education, 233 A.D. 701 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion for an alternative mandamus order, so called, unanimously affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not as a matter of discretion, upon the ground that appellant’s degree of bachelor of laws does not qualify her for equality, under the Education Law, with those teachers holding the degree of bachelor of arts. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion for an alternative mandamus order, so called, unanimously affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not as a matter of discretion, upon the ground that appellant’s degree of bachelor of laws does not qualify her for equality, under the Education Law, with those teachers holding the degree of bachelor of arts. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 A.D. 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broderick-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1931.