Broderick v. Archibald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Broderick v. Archibald

67 N.Y.S. 1129

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 7, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 67 N.Y.S. 1129 (Broderick v. Archibald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Broderick v. Archibald, 67 N.Y.S. 1129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jurisdiction to entertain these appeals is conferred by the charter of the city of Yonkers. The action of the city judge in prohibiting the judgment debtor from hearing the testimony of the third person was erroneous. The order appealed from is therefore reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the case remitted to the city judge to proceed with the examination under the original orders, with the injunction continued.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jurisdiction to entertain these appeals is conferred by the charter of the city of Yonkers. The action of the city judge in prohibiting the judgment debtor from hearing the testimony of the third person was erroneous. The order appealed from is therefore reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the case remitted to the city judge to proceed with the examination under the original orders, with the injunction continued.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 N.Y.S. 1129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broderick-v-archibald-nyappdiv-1900.