Broderick Maximillian McHenry v. State
This text of Broderick Maximillian McHenry v. State (Broderick Maximillian McHenry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 06-18-00036-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 3/9/2018 4:47 PM DEBBIE AUTREY 063-18-00036-CR CLERK
Trial # 16-0281X
BRODERICK M. McHENRY IN THE 6TH COURT OF FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS V. APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 3/9/2018 4:47:15 PM THE STATE OF TEXAS TEXARKANA, TEXAS DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Comes now the defendant, Broderick M. McHenry, by and thru his appointed
attorney, Vernard Solomon, and does hereby move this Honorable to grant a one
day extention to the time period required to give Notice of Appeal and in support
of said Motion would show the following.
I.
The trial began on January 9, 2018 before the Honorable Brad Morin, Attorney
Craig Fletcher represented the defendant on the trial of the merits by appointment
and was found guilty on the same date. Certification of the Right to Appeal was
signed the same date.
II.
Attorney Vemard Solomon was appointed on the 8th day of January, 2018 to handle the appeal of the matter to the 6 Court of Appeals. The Notice was
required to be filled on or before February 8, 2018. Notice was filed on February
9, 2018, one day late.
At this point mistakes were made by the appointed attorney for appeal including
the following:
(1) I mistakenly thought that the Notice was filed before 1 was appointed to
appeal the case based on the Certificate of the Right to Appeal;
(2) Twenty days were remaining at the time of the appointment with the
Statement of the Facts and the Court's records filed after the deadline for the
Notice of Appeal.
(3) 1 knew nothing of the case and the conversation with the trial attorney
was of no help.
(4) At this point it was called to my attention of the deadline with my
mistaken belief it was the next day, February 9, 2018. I guess I have begun to lost
the ability to count on a calender at the age of 74.
This Motion to Extend the time period one day will not in any way lessen the
position of the rights of the State of Texas but will grant to an indigent defendant
the due process of the law.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Attorney for the defendant
herein request the extension of one day for the filing of the Notice of Appeal. Respectfully Submitted,
Vernard Solomon 103 B. Houston Marshall, Texas 75670 Tele 903.938.4555 Fax 903.938.5151 SBN 18835000
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above Motion to Extend filyta ivereo the District Attorney's Office.
Vernard Solomon
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Broderick Maximillian McHenry v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broderick-maximillian-mchenry-v-state-texapp-2018.