Broderick Eugene Davis v. State
This text of Broderick Eugene Davis v. State (Broderick Eugene Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-07-0360-CR NO. 07-07-0361-CR NO. 07-07-0362-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
OCTOBER 15, 2007
______________________________
BRODERICK EUGENE DAVIS, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
_________________________________
FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;
NOS. 50781-D, 52425-D & 52253-D; HONORABLE DON EMERSON, JUDGE
_______________________________
Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Broderick Eugene Davis, filed notices of appeal challenging convictions
for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, robbery, and assault. By separate orders
signed September 27, 2007, the trial court granted Appellant’s Motion for New Trial. When the trial court grants a motion for new trial, it restores the case to its position
before the former trial. Tex. R. App. P. 21.9(b). Because there is no conviction to be
appealed, we have no jurisdiction to consider these appeals. See Waller v. State, 931
S.W.2d 640, 643-44 (Tex.App.–Dallas 1996, no pet.).
Consequently, the appeals are dismissed.
Patrick A. Pirtle Justice
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Broderick Eugene Davis v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broderick-eugene-davis-v-state-texapp-2007.