Broderick & Bascom Rope Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Broderick & Bascom Rope Co. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 6, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2585

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 9, 1967

DocketC. D. 2867

StatusPublished

This text of 58 Cust. Ct. 6 (Broderick & Bascom Rope Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Broderick & Bascom Rope Co. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 6, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2585 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Ford, Judge:

When, the suit listed aboye was called, there was no appearance by plaintiff either in person or by attorney. A motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution was made on behalf of the defendant.

An examination of the official papers indicates that the protest was not filed within the time prescribed by section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Accordingly, motion made on behalf of defendant is denied and protest is dismissed as being untimely.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford, Judge:

When, the suit listed aboye was called, there was no appearance by plaintiff either in person or by attorney. A motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution was made on behalf of the defendant.

An examination of the official papers indicates that the protest was not filed within the time prescribed by section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Accordingly, motion made on behalf of defendant is denied and protest is dismissed as being untimely.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 Cust. Ct. 6, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broderick-bascom-rope-co-v-united-states-cusc-1967.