Brocsonic Co. v. M/V "Mathilde Maersk"

270 F.3d 106, 2001 A.M.C. 2996, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22355, 2001 WL 1222480
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedOctober 16, 2001
DocketDocket No. 00-9534
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 270 F.3d 106 (Brocsonic Co. v. M/V "Mathilde Maersk") is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brocsonic Co. v. M/V "Mathilde Maersk", 270 F.3d 106, 2001 A.M.C. 2996, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22355, 2001 WL 1222480 (2d Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff Brocsonic Company appeals from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Leonard B. Sand, Judge, dismissing for lack of admiralty jurisdiction the plaintiff shipper’s action seeking damages for misdelivery of cargo stored by the defendant carrier, at plaintiffs request, for some 18 months after the completion of carriage. We affirm substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Sand’s opinion, reported at 120 F.Supp.2d 372 (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
270 F.3d 106, 2001 A.M.C. 2996, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22355, 2001 WL 1222480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brocsonic-co-v-mv-mathilde-maersk-ca2-2001.