Brocsonic Co. v. M/V "Mathilde Maersk"

Second Circuit

Brocsonic Co. v. M/V "Mathilde Maersk"

270 F.3d 106, 2001 A.M.C. 2996, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22355, 2001 WL 1222480

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided October 16, 2001·No. Docket No. 00-9534·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff Brocsonic Company appeals from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Leonard B. Sand, Judge, dismissing for lack of admiralty jurisdiction the plaintiff shipper’s action seeking damages for misdelivery of cargo stored by the defendant carrier, at plaintiffs request, for some 18 months after the completion of carriage. We affirm substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Sand’s opinion, reported at 120 F.Supp.2d 372 (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff Brocsonic Company appeals from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Leonard B. Sand, Judge, dismissing for lack of admiralty jurisdiction the plaintiff shipper’s action seeking damages for misdelivery of cargo stored by the defendant carrier, at plaintiffs request, for some 18 months after the completion of carriage. We affirm substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Sand’s opinion, reported at 120 F.Supp.2d 372 (2000).

Brocsonic Co. v. M/V "Mathilde Maersk", 270 F.3d 106, 2001 A.M.C. 2996, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22355, 2001 WL 1222480 (2d Cir. 2001).

Pincite

270 F.3d 106 (Brocsonic Co. v. M/V "Mathilde Maersk") — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related