Brockway v. Brien

37 How. Pr. 270
New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided June 15, 1869·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Sheehan

stated that he wished to make this a test case to settle the practice in supplementary proceedings, as [271] to his own knowledge great wi’ong was being done by changing referees and making orders while the first orders were still in force, and not set aside by any order of the court; and requested the judge to settle the practice, which was, up to this time doubtful.

Daly First Judge, coincided with defendants counsel, and decided that the first order in a supplementary proceeding must be finished or some order made by the court in the proceeding, before any other order could be made in the premises.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brockway v. Brien, 37 How. Pr. 270 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1869).

37 How. Pr. 270 (Brockway v. Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. Cram
157 A.D. 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)
Keihen v. Shipherd
4 N.Y.S. 339 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1889)