Brockway v. Brien

37 How. Pr. 270
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedJune 15, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 37 How. Pr. 270 (Brockway v. Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brockway v. Brien, 37 How. Pr. 270 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1869).

Opinion

Mr. Sheehan

stated that he wished to make this a test case to settle the practice in supplementary proceedings, as [271]*271to his own knowledge great wi’ong was being done by changing referees and making orders while the first orders were still in force, and not set aside by any order of the court; and requested the judge to settle the practice, which was, up to this time doubtful.

Daly First Judge, coincided with defendants counsel, and decided that the first order in a supplementary proceeding must be finished or some order made by the court in the proceeding, before any other order could be made in the premises.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. Cram
157 A.D. 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)
Keihen v. Shipherd
4 N.Y.S. 339 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 How. Pr. 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brockway-v-brien-nyctcompl-1869.